Russia Gets Hydroxychloroquine to Population
As a National Security Crisis Develops in the United States
Has Vladimir Putin Already Launched a Deadly COVID-20 Attack?

By

Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.

New York Articles published in the Russian press cite official Russian government documents providing ample evidence Russia has begun a program of universal prophylaxis of the population with hydroxychloroquine to protect the population as Russian President Vladimir Putin sets in motion the release of COVID-20, a deadly virus expected to hit the United States this September, in approximately 4 ½ months.

The articles, translated and presented here as an appendix, report the Russian Ministry of Health has overtaken the production by Russian pharmaceutical companies of sufficient quantities of hydroxychloroquine to administer to large segments of the Russian population. See Appendix here.

Putin Orders Hydroxychloroquine for Medical Treatment of COVID-19

As reported by this article published in Russia last month, in April 2020, the Russian National Medical Research Center for Cardiology of the Ministry of Health was instructed by the Russian government to carry out the “use, storage, and transmission” of this drug free of charge to qualified medical organizations throughout the nation.

On April 13, 2020, Mikhail Murashko, the head of the Ministry of Health for the Russian Federation, announced that Russian pharmaceutical companies were producing hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for the coronavirus known as COVID-19.

As early as December 10, 2018, Russian Federation Prime Minister Medvedev issued an order adding hydroxychloroquine to the list of medications approved for medical use by decision of authorized Russian medical commissions as proclaimed by the Russian Federation government.

Then, on April 18, 2020, after the Russian Federation government ordered Russian pharmaceutical companies to switch to the production of hydroxychloroquine, the Russian National Medical Center for Cardiology of the Russian Federation Ministry of Health ordered thousands of packages of unregistered Chinese hydroxychloroquine to be transferred to various medical organizations throughout the nation to be used in the treatment of coronavirus infection.

Subsequent to these determinations by the Russian Federation government, the program to administer hydroxychloroquine throughout the nation was undertaken regionally, as implemented by the various state governments comprising the Russian Federation as a whole.

Hydroxychloroquine is a 70-year-old medication that is one of the most widely prescribed anti-malarial medications in the world – a medication the medical profession today also prescribes for chronic use for treatment of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

The medical profession worldwide has generally considered hydroxychloroquine over these many decades to be relatively “safe” if taken under a medical doctor’s prescription after a review of the patient’s history to determine whether or not the patient’s medical history would indicate one of those relatively few medical conditions that would counter-indicate against prescribing the medication.

Discovering the Engineering of COVID-19 as a Bioweapon, Part 1

In January 2020, I realized that the scientific sequencing of COVID-19 strongly suggested a key element of the HIV-1 pathogen causing the AIDS epidemic worldwide, Glycoprotein 120 (GP12) had be spliced into the genome of a SARS virus “chassis” to create COVID-19.

This was reported first in a study sequencing COVID-19 by a group of medical scientists in India who published their findings article published by a group of medical scientists in India in the medical science journal BioRXiv in January 2020 was entitled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCov spike protein to HIV-1 and Gag.”

In a highly controversial finding, the medical scientists in India reported: “We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-Gag, all of which have identity/similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.”

The article almost immediately was withdrawn after disinformation experts recognized the medical scientists in India were suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular glycoprotein from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. Even more upsetting to disinformation operatives was the suggestion that the insertion of these 4 inserts into a SARS virus is not likely to occur in nature.

That the article was withdrawn under claims the study had not received adequate peer review caused me to suspect the findings of the Indian scientists were correct, but too controversial to be allowed to become known by the public, especially in the United States.

The clear suggestion was that COVID-19 was laboratory-created, possibly as a bioweapon, and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so, a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci. In a paper I drafted in January 2020, published on CorsiNation.com on April 28, 2020, I noted the insertion of GP120 into a SARS virus chassis I documented two awarded patents and two patent applications Fauci had for various treatments seeking to develop an antibody for GP120 in the original HIV-1 AIDS virus.

For those seeking to see the proof of this claim with their own eyes, the legal portal Justia.com lists the following “patents by inventor Anthony S. Fauci” involving a glycoprotein found in the HIV-1, a disease that attacks the human immune system, leading to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, more commonly known as AIDS. In 1990, Fauci held the same position at the NIH that he holds today. Fauci made his mark around the anti-viral medications that were developed by Big Pharma to combat the AIDS epidemic raging at that time.

Then, on May 6, 2020, I published a second article on CorsiNation.com, I expanded on the suggestion that Fauci’s patents read in a reverse-engineering manner presented a “blueprint” combines a HIV-1 attack on the human immune system with SARS-CoV-1, the pathogen from the original SARS (“Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome”) that created an international pandemic in 2002-2003. The pathogen in COVID-19 is named SARS-CoV-2 in medical scientific literature, and the epidemic caused by that virus is yet today being played out internationally.

A study not yet peer reviewed, led by vaccine researcher Nikolai Petrovsky of Flinders University in Australia, has concluded the propensity of the COVID-19 spike protein which the virus uses to enter healthy cells, has a capacity to bind to certain cell receptor enzymes, called “ACE2,” to allow the virus to infect human cells that did not come from an animal intermediary, but became specialized for human cell penetration by living previously in human cells, possibly in a laboratory.” The unique feature of the COVID-19 spike proteins was, of course, the addition of GP120 into the SARS virus chassis.

Discovering the Engineering of COVID-19 as a Bioweapon, Part 2

On last Sunday, May 10, “Mothers’ Day,” I received confirmation at approximately 4:30 am EST from an international source I have identified at CorsiNation.com as “Boris,” that my analysis of COVID-20 was being confirmed, but I was asked to identify one additional element to the re-design of the coronavirus SARS chassis needed to complete the bioengineering of COVID-20.

On May 11, 2020, I published a third article on CorsiNation.com, I hypothesized COVID-20 re-engineering was completed when a second element from HIV-1 research leading to patents bearing Fauci’s name was added: namely an attack involving the mechanism whereby integrin α4β7 is incorporated into the envelope of HIV-1 virions that becomes functionally active as it binds with MAdCAM-1 allowing the HIV-1 pathogen enters the body through the high endothelial venules in the intestinal mucosa.

Put simply, by adding GP120 to the spike protein of a SARS virus chassis, COVID-19 had been created, and by adding the integrin α4β7.to the virion envelope of COVID-19, COVID-20 would be created. As I studied the genome sequencing of COVID-19 as published in January by the scientists in India, I realized the genome of COVID-19 was structured like a group of sentences, with “periods” inserted to define the end of one sentence and the beginning of the next sentence. Into these breaks between sentences, I reasoned that integrin α4β7 could be added inserted by a biolaboratory much as GP120 had been inserted.

With this one final addition of integrin α4β7, COVID-20 will boost the virulence of the HIV-1 attack component of COVID-20 by introducing a swift and effective attack on the immune system through the intestines, effectively knocking out the body’s immune system to permit the SARS pathogen to colonize more rapidly in its move to propagate within the lungs.

A search of the medical scientific literature provided confirmation for this suspicion. For instance, an article published in the Journal of Leukocyte Biology on April 9, 2020 noted the following:

After the initial report that the major HIV‐1 envelope glycoprotein, gp120, can bind to α4β7, intensive research efforts have been focused on the role of α4β7 as a key factor in HIV‐1 pathogenesis and as a potential target for prevention and treatment. The interaction between α4β7 and its natural ligand, MAdCAM‐1, directs infected CD4 T cells and HIV‐1 virions carrying incorporated α4β7 to the gut mucosa, which may facilitate HIV‐1 seeding and replication in the intestinal compartment during the early stages of infection. In addition, cells that express high levels of α4β7, such as Th17 cells, represent preferential targets for infection, and their frequency in the circulation was shown to correlate with susceptibility to HIV‐1 infection and disease progression.

If COVID-20 were to be re-engineered in the fashion described in these three articles, we believe COVID-20 would be faster acting and more lethal that COVID-19, with the ability to infect and cause mortality among even younger adults with relatively healthy immune systems. Those experiencing comorbidity conditions and the elderly would be particularly vulnerable. We can even imagine that some of those with weaker immune systems could be infected and die within a relatively short period of time. With the immune system impaired by the HIV-1 attack, the SARS-like pulmonary attack could colonize and propagate in the lungs with significantly reduced resistance.

Putin Launches COVID-20, as Fauci and Hahn Demonize HCQ in USA

My concern intensified through last week as “Boris” confirmed his sources reported back to him a 60 percent chance my analysis of COVID-20 was correct, and last, that Putin had attempted to recall the release of COVID-20 after the publication of my first article but had been unable to do so. Again, I cannot confirm the reliability of this information.

Still, I realized that if I could make these deductions by following a mere suspicion that while Fauci has failed in the past 30 years to find his much touted “vaccine” for the HIV-1 AIDS disease, his patents identified the key elements of the HIV-1 virus that would have to be added into a SARS virus chassis to produce what I have been calling “COVID-20.”

I further realized that if I could conclude this as a mere novice in the study of virology, these same observations must have been obvious to medical science experts in the field of virology who were seeking to develop bioweapons.

My discovery since Friday that Russia has begun an official governmental program of distributing hydroxychloroquine to the Russian people on a crash basis that involves regional distribution through the states composing the Russian Federation added to my suspicion that Putin may have joined China in a WWIII effort to destroy the U.S. economy without firing a shot.

While I cannot be certain that Putin has adopted the HCQ + Zinc + Antibiotics protocol evidenced by the clinical practices of physicians Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in the United States and by Dr. Didier Raoult in France, that conclusion appears highly likely.

The unique structure of NIH and CDC allows scientists such as Fauci to patent various disease treatments and to profit from the creation of various medical vaccines and medical treatments. This is made possible by the structure of both NIH and CDC as basically 501(c)3 organizations plus a public/private component that allows the NIH and CDC to be seen as the government’s official medical bureaucracy, when both organizations are quasi-governmental at best.

Then, given the public illusion that NIH and CDC officials are motivated by the public’s interest in preventing disease and fostering health, these same NIH and CDC officials are allowed to express public policy decisions without reference to their possible profit motives.

Given that Fauci’s patents are assigned to HHS, it is not possible to determine whether or if Fauci has any financial interest in medical treatments and vaccines resulting from his patents. But, as documented by investigative journalist Bruce Nussbaum in his 1990 book entitled Good Intentions: How Big Business and the Medical Establishment Are Corrupting the Fight Against AIDS, Dr. Fauci’s actions in combating that disease appear to be in reprise today.

Then, as today, Fauci demonized medical solutions to the AIDS epidemic offered by community physicians seeking to utilize available medical treatments in favor of expensive treatments and promised vaccines that never materialized despite the obvious profit-motive of “Big Pharma” companies.

Why is the U.S. Medical Bureaucracy Demonizing Hydroxychloroquine?

The recent caution issued by Dr. Stephen Hahn, head of the FDA, that hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine used for treatment of COVID-19 created important health risks of heart rhythm problems given the FDA’s proclamation of hydroxychloroquine as a Q-T prolonging mechanism defies medical logic in that the warning is issued only for the prescription of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19, but not prescriptions of the same drugs for the treatment of malaria, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis.

What makes the population of COVID-19 suffers different in kind from those patients of malaria, lupus, or rheumatoid arthritis for which the prescription of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine is still an FDA-approved use? Even more hard to comprehend logically, by leaving hydroxychloroquine as an FDA-approved medication for malaria, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis, the FDA left in place a physician’s ability to prescribe hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 as “off-label” medication – a practice that today accounts for between 10-20 percent of all medications prescribed by physicians in the United States.

The only difference we can perceive is that Dr. Fauci and the U.S. medical bureaucracy of the quasi-governmental organizations comprised by NIH and CDC have demonized hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19, in favor of Big Pharma medications such as Gilead’s Remdesivir, and for the arrival of the much proclaimed COVID-19 vaccine.

Another irony is that even if a vaccine could be developed for COVID-19, it would not necessarily be efficacious preventing COVID-20. Should COVID-20 arrive in the United States in September 2020, we will once again be in the position that there is no FDA-approved medication for that particular virus, given the impossibility of conducting clinical trials on a virus that has not yet arrived on the scene.

By so demonizing hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19, Fauci and his bureaucratic medical colleagues may have prevented Americans from using an available and relatively inexpensive treatment and prophylaxis for COVID that, should my analysis prove correct, Putin is utilizing in preparation for a second-wave COVID-20 bio-warfare on the United States that will leave Americans dependent on expensive pharmaceutical medications for which initial clinical trials have been disappointing and a much-touted miracle cure vaccine that the history of the HIV-1 disease suggests may never materialize.

Moreover, given the experience of COVID-19, the U.S. population has now been conditioned to rush back into quarantine, further damaging an already badly damaged economy, on the basis of perpetually faulty mathematical models the CDC has used to threaten POTUS that “millions will die” and it will be the president’s fault unless the U.S. federal government follows the instructions spearheaded by Dr. Fauci himself.

There is currently no scientific evidence proving a nationwide quarantine was the solution to COVID-19 that yielded the lowest rates of mortality and morbidity. This despite developing clinical support for the suspicion populations of sufferers from lupus and rheumatoid arthritis suffered low rates of COVID-19 mortality and morbidity given their habitual use of hydroxychloroquine as a well-recognized and approved medication for those diseases.

Finally, I reflect on my realizations over this past Mothers’ Day in the further consideration that while physicians, state governors, federal and state law enforcement authorities, and state boards regulating physicians and pharmacies are edging toward criminalization of hydroxychloroquine for use in COVID-19 treatment and/or prophylaxis, it may be dependent upon the mothers in America seeking to protect their children to introduce some sanity into this discussion.

Given the performance of the nation’s mainstream media, the medical discussion over COVID-19 seems to have replaced the attempt to impeach President Trump with failed Russia Collusion and Ukraine Bribery allegations with a nascent ##VirusGate simply because President Trump dared to mention hydroxychloroquine as a potential “game changing” solution without first asking permission from Dr. Fauci.